|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- One large (1½ by 2 foot) plaster sample was formed with a single batch
of material, and troweled as a single unit
- Cement:water 1:0.5
- Cement:aggregate 1:1½
- Cement:calcium chloride 1:0.01 (1%)
|
|
3
|
- After troweling and hardening, the coupon was cut into eight sections
and labeled
- One of the sections was set aside, dry
- One section was “bicarb” started
- Water adjusted to TA 350 with bicarb before coupon was added
- One section was “acid” started
- Water adjusted to pH 4.5 with acid before coupon was added
- The other five were “traditional” started
- Water adjusted to pH 7.5 daily after coupons were added
|
|
4
|
- This coupon was kept dry for the entire course of the experiment
|
|
5
|
- This coupon was bicarb started for one week, with a daily pH check
(maintained at 8.2) and a daily surface brushing
- The coupon was removed from water after one week
|
|
6
|
- This coupon was acid started for one week, with a daily pH check
(maintained at 4.5) and a daily surface brushing
- The coupon was removed from water after one week
|
|
7
|
- This coupon was traditionally started for one week, with a daily pH
check (maintained at 7.5) and a daily surface brushing
- The coupon was removed from water after one week
|
|
8
|
- This coupon was traditionally started for one week, with a daily pH
check (maintained at 7.5) and a daily surface brushing
- The coupon then remained in pH 7.5 water for an additional three weeks
for a 30-day cure
|
|
9
|
- The last three sections, which were identical to the traditional/30
section, were then etched – one lightly, one moderately, and one heavily
- What the lab found actually matches what we already surmised from
experience, but the processes have now been scientifically documented
|
|
10
|
- Light Etch – pH 6.5 for a week… what will happen?
- Medium etch – pH 4.5 for a week… what will happen?
- Heavy etch – acid wash out of water with undiluted muriatic acid… what
will happen?
|
|
11
|
- This coupon was traditionally started for one week, with a daily pH
check (maintained at 7.5) and a daily surface brushing
- The coupon then remained in pH 7.5 water for an additional three weeks
for a 30-day cure
- The pH was then lowered to 6.0 for one week
|
|
12
|
- This coupon was traditionally started for one week, with a daily pH
check (maintained at 7.5) and a daily surface brushing
- The coupon then remained in pH 7.5 water for an additional three weeks
for a 30-day cure
- The pH was then lowered to 4.5 for one week
|
|
13
|
- This coupon was traditionally started for one week, with a daily pH
check (maintained at 7.5) and a daily surface brushing
- The coupon then remained in pH 7.5 water for an additional three weeks
for a 30-day cure
- The coupon was then removed from water and heavily acid washed
|
|
14
|
- Coupled with the many other coupon and actual pool plaster analyses
performed by this lab, a picture has emerged of the consequences of both
the startup chemistry and the effects of acid attack
- We will cover the startup chemistry in a different presentation
- The following slides help show what is happening to plaster when it is
put in water
|
|
15
|
- This is a graphic representation (from top to bottom) of the water,
plaster, gunite, and dirt
|
|
16
|
- This is an SEM image of the “dry” coupon showing no effect yet at
surface
|
|
17
|
- Once under water, the plaster releases calcium hydroxide, creating a
calcium-depleted zone at surface
|
|
18
|
- This is the “traditional” coupon showing the calcium depletion at
surface
|
|
19
|
- This calcium hydroxide reacts with bicarbonate in the water to form a
calcium carbonate precipitate – “plaster dust”
|
|
20
|
- As the concentration of calcium in the depleted zone becomes lower than
that of the underlying cement paste, calcium “migrates” into the
depleted zone to “even out” the distribution
|
|
21
|
- This SEM shows a band of calcium
diffusing into the depleted zone to even out the distribution
|
|
22
|
- As bicarbonate (part of the alkalinity) reacts with calcium hydroxide in
the surface plaster it forms a protective carbonation layer (of calcium
carbonate)
|
|
23
|
- The decalcification and diffusion processes continue until the
carbonation layer is sufficiently formed to block those processes
|
|
24
|
- This SEM (of the “cured 30 days” coupon) shows the protective calcium
carbonate layer
|
|
25
|
- This EDS shows the composition of the protective layer: almost pure
calcium carbonate (CaCO3)
|
|
26
|
- Eating away of the cement part of the surface
- Excess porosity in that eaten area
- Breakdown of the sand exposed at surface
- “the [etched] specimens all share characteristics of surface cement
paste erosion and evidence of calcite aggregate dissolution” (Dr.
Clark)
- Uniform effect across the surface
|
|
27
|
- The protective layer was compromised (i.e., the surface was eroded),
aggregate is rounded, and additional calcium is migrating to surface
|
|
28
|
- The protective layer was compromised (i.e., the surface was eroded),
aggregate is rounded, and the surface (to date) has been affected beyond
the ability to form an additional quality protective layer
|
|
29
|
- The entire carbonation and decalcification zones have been eaten away,
and even the aggregate is eaten into
|
|
30
|
- The carbonate layer acts to protect the underlying cement paste from
solutions permeating the surface.
- In the traditional sample it is very incomplete
- In the case of the Cure 30 sample the protective layer is incomplete,
with breaks in the layer occurring near or along aggregate at the
surface.
- In the Lite etch it is compromised
- In the Medium etch it is very affected
- In the Heavy etch it is gone
|
|
31
|
- “Micro-structural features indicative of the swimming pool industry’s
‘aggressive water’ are observed in the Lite Etch, Medium Etch and Heavy
Etched samples. While a region of porous, decalcified paste is present
in two of these samples (not present in the Heavy Etch sample), the
specimens all share characteristics of surface cement paste erosion and
evidence of calcite aggregate dissolution.” (Dr. Clark)
|
|
32
|
|